
Defenses to Medical Malpractice: Understanding Patient Negligence
Introduction
Key Defenses Related to Patient Negligence
- Contributory Negligence: This defense is used when a patient is partially responsible for their own injury. If a patient contributes to the harm they suffered, they may be barred from recovering damages, depending on the state's laws. For example, if a patient fails to follow medical advice or mixes medications against a doctor's orders, they might be considered contributory negligent.
- Comparative Negligence: Most jurisdictions follow comparative negligence rather than contributory negligence. Under this doctrine, even if the patient is partially at fault, they can still recover damages, but the amount may be reduced by their percentage of fault.
- Standard Negligence Defenses: These include arguing that the medical care provided was consistent with the standard of care expected in the medical profession, that the patient's injuries were not caused by a medical error, or that the healthcare provider was not the cause of the injuries.
- Respectable Minority Principle: This defense applies when a doctor uses a new or unconventional treatment that is supported by a respectable minority of medical professionals. If the doctor informed the patient of the risks and the treatment is supported by a minority of the medical community, this can be a valid defense against malpractice claims.
- Good Samaritan Laws: When a medical professional volunteers to aid someone, they owe that person a duty of care. The duty of care and treatment is the same standard as a reasonably competent physician (under the same or similar circumstances). But many states have Good Samaritan laws. These laws shield individuals who come to the aid of those in medical distress. Doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals are often specifically included in such laws. If a doctor aids someone in an emergency, they'll be protected from civil liability if something goes wrong during the rescue.
- Statute of Limitations: State laws place time limits on when an action can be brought for medical malpractice. Some states have adopted the “discovery rule." This means that the statute of limitations period does not begin until an injury is discovered. If a medical professional can show the patient discovered the injury at a certain point, and the statute of limitations has expired, the case may be dismissed.
Conclusion
Written by